Published by
ABA LawBlawg 100 Winner (2015)
-
Recent Posts
- What It Takes to Be a Trial Lawyer, If You Are a Woman
- Government Contractors Conducting Investigations: A New Normal?
- Yes, Maybe the Government Does Hate the Attorney-Client Privilege—The Challenge of Protecting the Privilege for Civil Investigative Demands
- Initial Coin Offerings and SEC Enforcement: Protecting Investors (Part IA)
- Prosecutors Sure Do Love the Perp Walk
Archives
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
Categories
- Acquittal After Jury Trial
- Antitrust
- Appeal
- Attorney client privilege
- Bail
- Bank fraud
- Brady violations
- Bribery
- CFTC case
- Change Venue
- civil case
- Civil forfeiture
- Civil Litigation Strategy
- Classifiied information
- Commercial Bribery
- Compliance
- Computer fraud
- Congressional investigation
- Conspiracy
- Continuing education
- Conviction After Jury Trial
- Criminal Forfeiture
- Criminal Investigation
- Deferred Prosecution Agreement
- Dentention issues
- Detention issues
- Discovery/Brady
- Dismissal of charges in indictment
- DOJ policy and practice
- DOJ Statements
- Due Diligence
- Environmental Crimes
- Ethics
- False Claims Act
- False statements
- FBI policy and practice
- FCPA
- Federal program fraud
- Fifth Amendment
- First Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Fraud on the court
- Gag order
- Government contracting fraud
- Grand jury
- Grand Jury Subpoena
- Health care fraud
- Honest Services
- Identity Theft
- Immunity
- Indictment
- Insider Trading
- internal investigation
- International Trade Violations
- Investor fraud
- Joint Defense Agreements
- Jury issues
- Kickbacks
- Lacey Act
- Legal profession
- Mail Fraud
- Marketing
- Money Laundering
- Non-Prosecution Agreement
- Obstruction
- OIG investigations
- Plea Agreement
- Policy issues
- Pre-Trial Motions Practice
- Proffers
- Prosecutorial misconduct
- Public Corruption
- Resource Guide
- Restitution
- Reversal
- RICO
- Search warrant
- SEC Investigation
- SEC policy and practice
- SEC Settlement
- Securities fraud
- Sentencing
- Speedy Trial Act
- Statute of Limitations
- Tax fraud
- Trade Secrets
- Travel Act
- Trial preparation
- Trials
- Uncategorized
- Venue
- Wire Fraud
- Wiretaps
- Witness tampering
Category Archives: Non-Prosecution Agreement
Releasing Corporate Monitor Reports after a Non-Prosecution Agreement
Peter Henning of the New York Times White Collar Watch published an interesting piece on February 8 about the confidentiality of reports filed by corporate monitors after a non-prosecution agreement against a company. The article describes a recent decision by … Continue reading
Collateral Damage: FCPA-Related Non-Prosecution Agreement for Hewlett-Packard Leads to Civil RICO Lawsuit
A non-prosecution agreement is a wonderful thing. But it may not mean the end of the woes for a company under government investigation. Hewlett-Packard (HP), the California-based technology firm, and its Mexican subsidiary, HP Mexico, entered into an NPA with … Continue reading
Posted in civil case, FCPA, Non-Prosecution Agreement, RICO
Tagged Technology industry
Leave a comment
Newsflash! DOJ Says It Wants To Prosecute Corporate Executives But It Is Ok Not To Prosecute Companies
Two recent appearances by high-ranking Department of Justice officials make clear that the target on corporate executives’ backs isn’t going away any time soon. On May 3, 2013, the Criminal Division’s Acting Assistant Attorney General Mythili Raman offered remarks at … Continue reading
