Published by
Contact Kropf Moseley PLLC
202-627-6900sara@kmlawfirm.com
andrea@kmlawfirm.comABA LawBlawg 100 Winner (2015)
-
Recent Posts
- Insider Trading on the Coronavirus? Not So Novel, After All
- Can the Government Seek Forfeiture of a Criminal Defense Attorney’s Fees? (Part 1)
- OIG Investigations in the Time of Coronavirus: Time and Attendance Fraud by Federal Employees
- Cell Site Evidence is Junk Science (and a Recent DC Opinion Could Help Keep It Out of Court)
- The Advantages of Small Firms (And Kropf Moseley Is Hiring)
Categories
- Acquittal After Jury Trial
- Antitrust
- Appeal
- Attorney client privilege
- Bail
- Bank fraud
- Blackmail/extortion
- Brady violations
- Bribery
- CFTC case
- Change Venue
- civil case
- Civil forfeiture
- Civil Litigation Strategy
- Classifiied information
- Commercial Bribery
- Compliance
- Computer fraud
- Congressional investigation
- Conspiracy
- Continuing education
- Conviction After Jury Trial
- Criminal Forfeiture
- Criminal Investigation
- Deferred Prosecution Agreement
- Dentention issues
- Detention issues
- Discovery/Brady
- Dismissal of charges in indictment
- DOJ policy and practice
- DOJ Statements
- Due Diligence
- Environmental Crimes
- Ethics
- False Claims Act
- False statements
- FBI policy and practice
- FCPA
- Federal program fraud
- Fifth Amendment
- First Amendment
- Forensic evidence
- Fourth Amendment
- Fraud on the court
- Gag order
- Government contracting fraud
- Grand jury
- Grand Jury Subpoena
- Health care fraud
- Honest Services
- Identity Theft
- Immunity
- Indictment
- Insider Trading
- internal investigation
- International Trade Violations
- Investor fraud
- Joint Defense Agreements
- Jury issues
- Kickbacks
- Lacey Act
- Legal profession
- Mail Fraud
- Marketing
- Money Laundering
- Non-Prosecution Agreement
- Obstruction
- OIG investigations
- Perjury
- Plea Agreement
- Policy issues
- Pre-Trial Motions Practice
- Proffers
- Prosecutorial misconduct
- Public Corruption
- Research misconduct
- Resource Guide
- Restitution
- Reversal
- RICO
- Search warrant
- SEC Investigation
- SEC policy and practice
- SEC Settlement
- Securities fraud
- Sentencing
- Speedy Trial Act
- Statute of Limitations
- Taint teams
- Tax fraud
- Trade Secrets
- Travel Act
- Trial preparation
- Trials
- Uncategorized
- Venue
- Wire Fraud
- Wiretaps
- Witness tampering
Category Archives: Policy issues
The Government Keeps Trying to Erase Its Wrongdoing
A few months ago, I wrote about the successful effort by a U.S. Attorney’s Office to convince the First Circuit to remove the name of a prosecutor involved in a case about Brady violations. Now, in a case in Philadelphia, … Continue reading
Question of the Day: Should Defendants Get Complete Discovery Before Deciding Whether To Plead Guilty?
A few days ago, I attended the excellent white collar conference sponsored by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) in Washington, DC. During one of the panels, an interesting topic arose: should criminal defendants be entitled to discovery … Continue reading
Posted in Discovery/Brady, Policy issues
1 Comment
